Program and organizational stakeholders looking to do and be collaborative struggle to identify, practice and evaluate collaboration with efficacy. This workshop will demonstrate how the principles of collaboration theory can be used to inform evaluation practice. You will have the opportunity to increase your capacity to quantitatively and qualitatively examine the development of inter-organizational, intra-organizational and inter-professional collaboration
4 attachments
See matching library entry files - The team uses performance data to evalua...
#Non-ProfitsandFoundationsEvaluation #organizational #Organizations #institutional #networks #foundations #institutions #EvaluationManagersandSupervisors #philanthropy #OrganizationalLearningandEvalCapacityBuilding
VK AEA Evaluation into Orgs 102805.ppt
#foundations #philanthropy #Organizations #category #OrganizationalLearningandEvalCapacityBuilding #classification #Non-ProfitsandFoundationsEvaluation #EvaluationManagersandSupervisors #organizational #database
VK AEA 2002 Presentation05.ppt
Where do evaluation and evaluative thinking show up in an 'organizational learning culture'? This presentation from AEA 2001 looks at the three different levels of organizational culture and asks, Where does evaluation fit into the concept of the learning organization? And, What have we learned from the research on organizational culture change that can help us figure out how best to embed evaluative thinking, evaluative practice, and evaluation systems, policies and tools into mainstream organizational life?
olcult.pdf
I shared why I love being an internal evaluator at a community-based non-profit organization in Washington, D.C. #Non-ProfitsandFoundationsEvaluation #OrganizationalLearningandEvalCapacityBuilding #InternalEvaluation #Ignite #Youth #2012Conference #LatinAmericanYouthCenter #AnnKEmery #YouthFocusedEvaluation #organizational-learning #internal evaluation
This study investigated six exemplary organizations that systematically incorporated knowledge flow into their evaluative decisions. The study operationalizes leadership and cultural conditions that encourage front-line workers delivering a product or service to contribute to a knowledge platform of shared thoughts, processes, and materials
Knowledge Flow-A Continuous Force in Effective Evaluation.pdf
While CHCF has had a long-standing evaluation function, a refreshed strategy and organizational structure that emphasize foundation-wide goals and accountability for measurable impact provide an opportunity to further strengthen its evaluation & learning practice. In particular, CHCF hopes to move from a learning approach that is largely retrospective to one that is ongoing; from evaluating individual grants and projects to evaluating strategy and bodies of work; and from individual learning to cross-program learning
2 attachments
These documents describe and present a tool to assess an organization's monitoring and evaluation standards. This was created for a decentralized health development organization (Jhpiego, an affiliate of Johns Hopkins University) working in 45 countries and a diverse monitoring and evaluation staff to provide organizational expectations for M&E
3 attachments
1 Comment - no search term matches found in comments.
Presentation made by Hubert Paulmer at the AEA 2009 Conference, Orlando FL on November 12, 2009, #BusinessLeadershipandPerformance #OrganizationalLearningandEvalCapacityBuilding #InternationalandCross-CulturalEval #organizational #Non-ProfitsandFoundationsEvaluation #sustainability ...
AEA 2009 Presentation-Nov12 - Hubert Paulmer.pdf
Evaluation or assessment of scientific work in universities and other research organizations has traditionally been organised around the peer review system with its almost jury-like functionality and a history of more than 300 years. The classic tradition looked only at the output or the product of scientific work, ignoring everything else and was for many years, and to a large degree still is, acknowledged as a necessary procedure to evaluate something as unique as scientific work
AEA paper 2009 Peer reviuew and dialogue.doc